Archive for the ‘Poynter’ Category

The online ethics seal: together we can be more transparent

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

At ONA 08 and a week later at Poynter Seminar on ethics, I talked about my online ethics seal idea.

The idea is very simple —  to form a series of ethics seals that Web sites, blogs and news organizations could embed on their Web sites. I want these seals to be in the same vein as the Creative Commons.

Right now there are five seal categories:

  1. Sourcing
  2. Objectivity/advocacy/opinion journalism or opinion
  3. Linking
  4. Copy editing/fact checking (does a second person fact check?)
  5. Conflicts of Interests
Each category can have a different level. For instance, your blog could say that you do not accept anonymous sources, while I might accept anonymous sources as long as two-independent sources confirm the same information. This will create a lot of freedom for people to customize their specific ethics policy within our open source framework.

The seals are developed by the community:

  • The seals are open source — The community gets to decide which level of the seals means. This also means that people are free to change the language of a seal as long as they open source their new seal.
  • That means the seals will evolve — Over time, we can update the ethics seals to reflect the current state of the Web. There will be version 1.0, 2.0, etch of each seal.
  • The community is more than just blogs — Any online ethics seal can’t succeed if it hopes to only serve blogs (or “govern” them). Rather a good seal should be applicable to traditional media sources and new media sources. It should be a common ground, because on the Web traditional and new media lines are blurred.
  • The seals are just beginning — Right now I have laid out five seal categories. Maybe we need more categories. Maybe we need less. Together, we’ll figure out the core areas to develop seals around.
Why would I want an ethics seal?
  • Transparency — This is the name of the game. What these seals are saying is this is how you and your news organizations/blogs go about reporting/posting. It’s not about casting judgement. Just about transparency. So what if your blog publishes rumors? What I’m saying is just be honest with your users.
  • Advertising — Advertisers consider blogs even less valuable than social networks. Why? Stigma. Many people feel that bloggers have no ethics. That’s not true. Many bloggers do, but they aren’t clear on what their ethics are. Many bloggers and online publications want ethics policies, but where do they start? We’ll make selecting an ethics policy as easy as selecting a Creative Commons copyright policy.
  • Ease of use — Why develop your own ethics seal and policy, if you could adopt an open source policy that is widely used and understood by users? Developing a custom ethics policy can take a lot of time. Instead, you can mix and match different seal categories to form your own policy in a matter of minutes. Want customization? The seals are open source. Customize our seals and wording. Just make sure to post what you have changed.
  • Our users will thank us — Even the most staid of traditional media sources make it tough to know how they report (almost every news organization has an copyright policy on every page, but an ethics policy is no where to be found). They are not transparent about the reporting process, but our readers deserve better. Imagine if my blog and The New York Times had the same open source ethics policy? It’s possible. This would ultimately be really great for users, because users would be able to easily understand how each site reports because our ethics policies are open source, widely used and easy to identify.
Our users will ultimately be the biggest winners:
  • Let’s be transparent — Why are copyright policies so widespread and yet ethics policies are so clandestine? What is ultimately more important to our readers? How we report and blog or how they can use our content? If you think you have better ethics than “those bloggers,” prove it. if your blog practices journalism, prove it. This is about being honest about who we are.
  • This will help users find relevant content — Part of the ethics seal is a central Web site and database that lists participating Web sites and blogs by seal type, content type and geographic location. If I want to look up a local sports Web site in my area, with a certain ethics seal, I can do so. Maybe I’m looking for technology rumor blogs. By utilizing the same open source seals, people will be able to find similar content. If you don’t want your national security news to contain anonymous sources, you can select from news outlets and blogs that do not use anonymous sources.
  • It comes with cool icons — Obviously entire ethics polices cannot be embedded in the footer of Web sites, but cool, memorable icons can be. Each seal category will have its own icon. Each “level” will have its own color. The five seals will be placed in a row in a footers on every page of a Web site to help people quickly comprehend what kind of ethics policy that Web site has. Each seal will link back to a page on our Web site that lists the full ethics for that given seal.
  • No legalese, please — Each seal will be written in plain English. Ethics seals are non-binding. There is no reason for them to read like the back of a credit card offer. So, they won’t. We’ll make them easy for anyone to understand.
Take action:
  • Post suggestions — Post your thoughts in the comments section of this post or on your blog.
  • Join the Wiki — We have an online ethics wiki. Join the Wiki and help shape the future of this project.
  • Spread the word — Link people up to this post. Tell them about the seal. Tell people about how together we’re going to usher in a new era of reporting transparency on the Web. It doesn’t matter anymore on the Web if someone works for a newspaper or a blog. What ultimately matters is how we go about reporting and creating content.

Final project at online storytelling seminar

Saturday, January 19th, 2008

I did my Poynter project on a no kill animal shelter in St. Petersburg.

Now, the projects that most of us did probably would have been handled differently in a real-world situation. I spent a few hours at the shelter, but in real life, I would have spent more time. I would have called ahead and came during specific events: a new pet being taken in, a pet being adopted out, scheduled exercise situations, etc.

That’s not how things were because of time constraints. We called up potential story contacts and showed up shortly thereafter and captured whatever we could. But in some ways this was good.

It forced us to work with what we had, which was less than we would have normally captured under ideal circumstances. It forced us to maximize what we have.

I was in way over my head with a Canon Mark III. I normally use a prosumer-level Nikon, not a professional-level Canon.

The projects were fun and quite a learning experience. Best advice I can give you: select not compress.

petpal.jpg

Thumbs up for Online Storytelling seminar at Poynter

Saturday, January 19th, 2008

I can now officially recommend the Online Storytelling With Audio & Images seminar at Poynter.

Creating an audio slideshow is easy. Creating a great audio slideshow is hard. This seminar can help show you how to make the latter.

The seminar had many audio slideshow neophytes but also people who had some experience with audio slideshows. Everyone learned something about multimedia, but those who came in with experience made the strongest final projects, because they were able to take an existing skill and take it to the next level.

This was the first time they have offered the seminar, so I think we can safely say it will evolve over time. Even in its current state, however, I think many journalists will benefit from this seminar.

I may have personally benefited the most from this seminar by learning more about audio from NPR’s Howard Berkes. Audio is often the No. 1 component lacking in audio slideshows, and having someone from NPR there all week to work with us was a great bonus. The quality of the audio often doesn’t match the images.

Soundslides is not a tough program to learn (probably one of the easiest you’ll find), but that doesn’t mean it’s easy to make good slideshows. Even if you are already creating audio slideshows, you’ll probably benefit from this seminar, especially if you haven’t had any or little formal training in the following:

  1. Audio - Using an audio recorder or audio editing program isn’t rocket science. Natural sounding audio is often a challenge, however, and so is being able to weave a strong narrative with just sound. Many people who want to make audio slideshows might benefit from first trying to create an audio story. I’ve had some audio training before, and I still learned a lot from Berkes.
  2. How to make a tight narrative with multimedia - The guys at Poynter hammered home the need to select not compress. We all fall in love with our work, but most people will not stick around for a long, meandering slideshow. Having several professionals there to give you advice on what they would cut and why is a big help. I know that advice isn’t possible in my newsroom because no one else makes multimedia.
  3. The power of images - If you’re like me, you’re not a full-time photojournalist. And, like me, you might know how to handle a DSLR and take some good photos from time to time, but you don’t know the ins and outs of what makes a strong image. And frankly, you could use some help on understanding the power of images. Joe Weiss, creator of Soundslides, spent a lot of time just discussing the importance of using strong images in a slideshow and what makes a strong image. He spent several years at MSNBC making audio slideshows, and he has plenty of examples to show.

Existing photographers would seem to benefit the most from this seminar because it’s much heavier on audio help than photo help. If I could make one change to the seminar it would be to spend more time on how to physically take a good photo. That’s something I know the non-photojournalists struggled with and felt they could have learned more about.

That being said, I would say that several of the top slideshows were made by non-photojournalists at the seminar. The one thing many photojournalists struggle at is weaving a tight narrative because they have never really had to do that before. The seminar would benefit in the future from helping those photojournalists learn how to weave a tighter narrative.

I can safely recommend the seminar. You’ll learn a lot in a week. Even if your work will not pay for you, I’d strongly consider it.

This is the kind of stuff more j-schools need to teach.

More thoughts on Poynter

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

Multimedia journalism is one of those funny things in life.

Most of the people producing it weren’t originally multimedia — they were monomedia. If you’re a photographer you just add some audio skills and all the sudden you have multimedia. Right?

The unique problem of creating audio slideshows is often people work on them by themselves. This means they have to try to capture audio and photos at the same time. Obviously, you can’t do both well at the same time.

Photographers naturally fall back on what they know best — photos. They’ll shoot away, searching for great compositions and lighting. But they’ll let the audio slide a bit.

Those who come from an audio or video background, tend to do the opposite. Photography is firmly an art, more so than many other forms of media. So, an audio or a video person will first concentrate on getting a great interview and then try to get some shots.

In some ways, that’s probably the best course of action. You might as well get one facet of an audio slideshow nailed.

But the best way to get a strong, emotive slideshow is to plan on set times for grabbing audio and set times for grabbing photos. Don’t try to do both at once.

Either both with suffer or one will be a complete after thought. But you should always be ready to switch things up in case you need to grab a great clip or shot. I think, however, figuring out when and where you will do each skill will make it a lot easier.

Even though I already knew how to make an audio slideshow in both Soundslides and Flash before I came here, I am glad I did. There is a difference between knowing how to technically make an audio slideshow and knowing how to create great journalism.

I’m hoping to show the rest of Stripes how to make great multimedia journalism.

Poynter day 2: Attitude is everything

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

I’ve noticed that many of the participants have done multimedia journalism before and used Soundslides.

Those journalists, much like me, are not here to learn how to do something new, but rather how to do something better. Soundslides is one of those programs you can learn in five minutes. I’m not kidding.

But knowing how to shoot photos, capture audio or use Soundslides is often not enough for great journalism. I’m at this seminar to learn to produce better journalism. I want to make journalism that matters.

Much like how my reporting class with professor Jack Lule showed me how to be a more complete writer and reporter, this seminar is showing me how to be a more complete multimedia reporter (and having the creator of Soundslides here all week is quite nice). The interplay between audio and photos is different than audio and words and even different than audio and video.

Making audio slideshows is easy. They really are. Making good ones, however, isn’t.

What’s remarkable (to me at least) is the age of the attendees. I’m by far the youngest one. What really amazes me is the enthusiasm I see from people who in some cases are more than double my age.

It’s the kind of enthusiasm I don’t see a lot of in journalists my age. One of the hosts asked an older photographer why she was at the seminar. He said she could just mail it in for a few more years and then retire.

The answer is because she wanted to learn. She didn’t have to be here. She is a talented photographer and professor who doesn’t need to keep working much longer.

But she has wanted to learn multimedia journalism for years so she could teach it to her students. It just proves that age has nothing to do with it.

Attitude is everything.

Early thoughts at Poynter

Monday, January 14th, 2008

One thing sticks out at the online storytelling seminar at the Poynter Institute: the background of those attending.

Consider this:

Attendees by Medium

I can’t explain why this gulf exists, but it appears photojournalists are more willing to try learning new skills. One of the hosts said that photojournalists are more pliable than print reporters.

Perhaps, it’s less of a step to go from being a photojournalist to a multimedia journalist. I don’t know, but I do know that only three print reporters are attending the inaugural online story telling seminar at Poynter, and there are a lot more print reporters than photojournalists in this country.

Heading down to Florida for a Poynter seminar

Thursday, January 10th, 2008

I’ll be heading off to Poynter this Saturday for a seminar on online storytelling with audio and images.

That means there will not be a lot of updates next week on the state of journalism and Web development. But it does mean there will be updates on the conference itself. I know a lot of you are interested in learning multimedia journalism, and I hope to give you a report on what I learn and whether or not I would suggest this seminar for other journalists.

If you want to learn something new, but your work won’t give you training, consider signing up for a Poynter seminar. They have many different ones to choose between, and if you sit around waiting for someone to train you, you’ll always be behind.

If you have any specific questions you’d like me to answer about the seminar or look into, just post a comment. I can also ask the Poynter people questions for you.