<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reediting Web video is easy, fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/2008/05/07/reediting-web-video-is-easy-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/2008/05/07/reediting-web-video-is-easy-fast/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a technologist and journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/2008/05/07/reediting-web-video-is-easy-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/?p=265#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>@Chris,
I have a quad-core computer at work with 768 megs of VRAM. It tears threw video, and allows me to do some nice multitasking (like having Adobe Soundbooth open at the same time). An older machine would certainly struggle with a quick turnaround. 

I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;d call it an Eulogy. It was just some remarks from her. I&#039;m going to see how the reaction is to this video, but I&#039;m not averse to busting the content up into separate videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris,<br />
I have a quad-core computer at work with 768 megs of VRAM. It tears threw video, and allows me to do some nice multitasking (like having Adobe Soundbooth open at the same time). An older machine would certainly struggle with a quick turnaround. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;d call it an Eulogy. It was just some remarks from her. I&#8217;m going to see how the reaction is to this video, but I&#8217;m not averse to busting the content up into separate videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Amico</title>
		<link>http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/2008/05/07/reediting-web-video-is-easy-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Amico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patthorntonfiles.com/blog/?p=265#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>Shorter is definitely more watchable. I think I&#039;d still make a video of the eulogy into a separate video (meaning there would be two videos produced, with some content overlap), but for the encapsulated version, this works well. Impressed that you did the re-cut in 15 minutes. I think I spend that much time waiting for the beach ball of death to stop spinning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter is definitely more watchable. I think I&#8217;d still make a video of the eulogy into a separate video (meaning there would be two videos produced, with some content overlap), but for the encapsulated version, this works well. Impressed that you did the re-cut in 15 minutes. I think I spend that much time waiting for the beach ball of death to stop spinning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

