Why newspapers don’t appeal to young people, part 2

Content.

There just isn’t enough content that appeals to younger readers in most newspapers. As many of my younger readers have noted, newspapers are aimed at older people, many of them retired. It’s not just the print format that bothers younger people.

Why aren’t there more stories that matter to younger generations? When you look at the kinds of stories that papers write about, especially local papers, it should not be a shock that younger people in this country are not interested. I read the Post, Times and other major publications because I care about what is going on in the U.S. and the World (I was a political science major after all).

But I really don’t read smaller papers, and I’m not that dedicated of a read to either the Post or Times. I check CNET.com more often than I check washingtonpost.com. The content over at CNET is often just more appealing to me.

A lot of papers try to cater to a younger audience by releasing an “alternative publication.” Those are insulting and not aimed at young professionals — an audience that newspapers desperately need. An astute Journalism Iconoclast reader, and young copy editor, recently said:

I’ve seen a lot of newspapers attempt to put out a print product specifically for the 18-26 or 21-30 crowd. They’re terrible. For some reason, the people launching these things think that young professionals only care about happy hour, movies, concerts and restaurants. All we care about is entertainment. Do they really think we’re that one-dimensional?

There’s a market out there (probably on the Web) for a publication with information and stories relevant to young people’s lives. To be honest, no matter how great my newspaper’s Web site becomes, I wouldn’t be interested in it — its content is geared toward parents and senior citizens.

What the younger crowd needs is the right content packaged the right way. Stories about people our age and how national stories affect people our age. Just please, no more lists of “hot bars.”

We want meaningful stories about the issues that matter most in our lives.

Why aren’t there more stories about how expensive higher education is? That’s certainly an area that appeals to high school, college age and post college age people. It also appeals to parents as well.

College is becoming outrageously expensive, with many top schools costs rising at 7%+ each year. That far outpaces inflation and economic growth in this country. To make matters worse, President Bush and Congress cut some higher education aid.

The Iraq War is often told through lenses that appeal to older generations, but rarely touches on the levels that matter most to my generation — the generation fighting the war. A lot of older people want to debate why we got into this war, how we can win it or how best to withdrawal. But if you might actually fight the war, you’re much more concerned about adequate equipment, deployment times (stop loss, etc), what will happen to you if you get injured, will the happen once you get discharged, the realities of post traumatic stress syndrome, etc.

Social Security and health care are two other huge areas of concern. We know that Social Security will not be able to sustain itself, which would have a massive impact on my generation. Older generations simply don’t care about this because it won’t affect them, but it is a big deal to millions of Americans.

My age group is also the least insured of any group in America. How often do we hear about that, or the decisions that many people my age face with regards to health care?

Then there is arts and entertainment coverage. For many people in my generation video games are preferred over movies and music. Yet, most main stream media publications treat video games as some sort of bastard child. They don’t cover the industry (an industry that many older politicians want to censor) or regularly review games.

Yet, there are plenty of music and movie reviews. You might want to start seriously considering video games. It’s an important art form to millions of Americans. The average video game player is not a kid, as the media stereotype would have you believe. According to the Entertainment Software Association, the average video game player is 33 years old.

The average person who reads movie reviews in a paper is probably at least twice that age. If you want to attract younger people, like say me, you might want to have content that appeals to us. Appealing content would work very well on your Web sites.

These are just a few areas that newspapers could cover differently, but there are countless examples and stories that matter to my generation. But no one is telling them.

Three of my most visited sites are IGN.com, CNET.com and DrudgeReport.com. You might want to take note of that.

The content just isn’t there in most newspapers or on their Web sites, let alone the ways we want news covered.

If all the people making decisions at your publication are old, white males, who do you honestly expect is your audience?

Old, white males.

 Don’t miss part one from last month.

  • Pingback: University Update - Hell's Kitchen - Why newspapers don’t appeal to young people, part 2

  • http://www.matthewdasilva.com Matthew da Silva

    Newspapers are aware and there are some interesting columns in the ‘dedicated’ vehicles put out to ‘target’ the ‘demographic’. The Sydney Morning Herald recently redesigned its Web home page and put out a story showing they get 3.7 million ‘unique browsers’ per month, making it the most-visited news site in Australia.

    They are not suffering. Print circulation is down, sure. But ad-spend online is rising, so this compensates.

    Charlie Forsyth’s piece of last November says most of what’s in your post:

    http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=5204

    Your ‘astute’ commenter’s remark that “the right content packaged the right way” is needed, is not really useful, IMHO. “Stories about people our age and how national stories affect people our age”? Say what?

    Do journalists step out on a limb and appear to actually have a brain, or do they simply write about the latest Live Aid concert ‘designed’ to assist third-world residents?

    Your opinion re video games is good, tho.

    OK, what do people watch? Michael Moore? George Gittoes? Both ‘old-school’ liberal polemicists in a category dating back to the ‘original’ polemicist (the only one Americans are likely to know): Thomas Paine.

    Oh, and by the way, he was English.

    But at least these guys draw audiences. Moore’s tactic is to cut his footage for rapid delivery, much like the Looney Tunes skits he consumed as a kid. Gittoes is better. He goes in, ‘embedded’ but without a pass card from General HQ. He shoots Marines rapping, Iraqi youths playing heavy metal in a basement, soldiers singing hymns against a backdrop of single-storey, cement-rendered bungalows and sand.

    Is this as far from centre the most liberal photojournalist is able to go?

  • Jack Lachey

    I agree with much of what you are saying. I am in my mid 20s and I only read the major publications and frequent popular blogs that have a certain focus or are geared a certain way. I often read these publications in the evening though. I read the blogs throughout the day. I read the local paper in the morning when I take a shit. If newspapers want to expand their spheres of influence they should enhance their coverage to better accomodate the regional zeitgeist. That’s just my take on it.

  • http://www.matthewdasilva.com Matthew da Silva

    “that have a certain focus or are geared a certain way”

    This is not illuminating. Can you describe the type of angle or content you prize?

    “the regional zeitgeist”

    Also not illuminating. Details are valuable if you want your reader to understand.

  • Jack Lachey

    A certain focus as in sports or foreign policy. Regional zeitgeist refers to popular sentiment in a localized region, e.g. health care concerns (though this is national as well). It’s important to have content run along these lines. I usually like the stories I read to follow through like that. When I’m taking my morning shit, I can get a good idea of what’s being said outside the bathroom door. Sometimes at my job, the same paper stays in the stall for weeks, letting us all get to read it and comment on the stories via pen/pencil. This is a rudimentary form of two way conversation in which the original creator of the news is distinct and removed from those who are discussing it.